> -----Original Message----- > From: Danny Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:58 PM > Umm, wouldn't the mingwlibs-for-mingw do. Probably. All it needs is a) A maintainer. b) libstdc++.a and libgcc.a. I found those in mingw-gcc. > If your just talking about STL in the strict sense, you shouldn't need > libstdc++.a. The templated STL lives in the headers. That's > the virtue of > templated classes. Char specializations for [Non-]Standard > iostreams and > string classes live in libstdc++.a but they are not templated pre-3.0 Agreed - but we are talking pre-3 :}. Rob
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Charles Wilson
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Charles Wilson
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Danny Smith
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Earnie Boyd
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler
- RE: rebasing new packages?! Robert Collins
- Re: rebasing new packages?! Jason Tishler