On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:31:48AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM > > > I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was > > that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of > > course, that > > means the setup repository). The standalone rebase.exe > > should be built > > within that project, along with setup.exe which would > > leverage the same > > code. > > > > That way, there's no possibility that the two programs would get > > out-of-sync with respect to the /etc/rebase.conf (?) information and > > file format. > > Yes, and at that point we had two issues: > 1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't > available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
Having STL would really speed things up. When I saw you adding libstdc++, I thought implied STL but I was mistaken. Can we enable STL for setup.exe? > 2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking. Yes, mainly in the area of how I persisted the free and used lists. Additionally, another major issue to resolve is how to deal with DLLs that get corrupted by rebasing. Jason
