> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 3:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: rebasing new packages?!
>
>
> Rob,
>
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:55:31PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
> > b) is an alternative approach to what I've already
> documented here. So
> > it covers libstc++ aka libg++-3. I don't know how much of
> the STL that
> > includes (see my earlier email).
>
> Can we remove the "-Werror" option and start using STL in setup.exe?
IF there are warnings, they should be cleaned up. The Werror option
stays unless there is a compelling reason not to use it. At -O2 inlines
are only done on code within the class declaration and code marked as
inlinable, so this particular warning should be resolvable. Looking at
it, they are trying to inline a recursive function call.... I don't know
if that is or isn't an issue for newer gcc's, but it sure sounds like
our one doesn't like it.
There are 3 instances of that function call in the g++-3 directory, one
from within it, and two from the template right below it's definition.
Perhaps removing the explicit inline from the definition is appropriate?
(-O3 will automatically inline it, and probably get that warning again,
but casual users would be safe.
Or perhaps it's resolved in newer g++-3 versions, and we can update?
Rob
