On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > > > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that > > version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the > > testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays as -3 when > > uploading. Likewise, updating -1 to -2 to -3 during the review process > > allows the testers to update properly. Does that make sense? > > Ok, but if one releases a new Cygwin package shouldn't it get -1, which > will make it first Cygwin release of this package ? And I'm under the > impression that xerces is a new package :)
No, it should get *a* number that will then monotonically increase within the same vendor version number. Rob -- --- GPG key available at: http://users.bigpond.net.au/robertc/keys.txt. ---
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part