On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 01:01, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > > On 6 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote: > > > > > Consider this: if the test copy we review was -3, and you approve that > > > version, you should not rename it to -1, else when -2 comes out, all the > > > testers will fail to upgrade. So -3 in review, stays as -3 when > > > uploading. Likewise, updating -1 to -2 to -3 during the review process > > > allows the testers to update properly. Does that make sense? > > > > Ok, but if one releases a new Cygwin package shouldn't it get -1, which > > will make it first Cygwin release of this package ? And I'm under the > > impression that xerces is a new package :) > > No, it should get *a* number that will then monotonically increase > within the same vendor version number. Ok, I've just checked the package naming conventions to refresh my memory. Check this: http://cygwin.com/setup.html#naming Maybe it should be updated.
