Re: When will cygwin ever be stable?

[Andy Piper]

egor duda <deo at logos-m dot ru> wrote:
 > i wonder if it was my changes to w32api that change _ANONYMOUS_*
 > semantics? they surely can break applications that include headers
 > individually without including <windows.h> first. since you didn't

Actually this was the cause of the problem, and it existed because I was 
using code that originated from the cygwin setup - which had the same 
problems. I'm not sure that including individual headers is wrong - but 
there we go.

andy


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple