Andy Piper wrote:
>
> egor duda <deo at logos-m dot ru> wrote:
> > i wonder if it was my changes to w32api that change _ANONYMOUS_*
> > semantics? they surely can break applications that include headers
> > individually without including <windows.h> first. since you didn't
>
> Actually this was the cause of the problem, and it existed because I was
> using code that originated from the cygwin setup - which had the same
> problems. I'm not sure that including individual headers is wrong - but
> there we go.
>
According to the w32api maintainer, including individual headers is
wrong.
Earnie.
The w32api maintainer.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
