On 08/20/2016 01:05 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:40:43AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: >> I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is >> fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. >> Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be >> vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better? > > Agreed. As I read it, this is not Tor fork, just the browser, right?
| Short Term: Achieve technical parity with regard to security and | features to predecessor codebases through rapid inclusion of | upstream commits. | Short Term: Add functionality to allow browser users to select | chosen network traversal method (Tor vs Independent Onion Routing). | Short Term: Begin Independent Onion Router network infrastructure | deployment. Right. I was referring to "Independent Onion Router network".