On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:05:07AM +0300, Georgi Guninski wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 12:40:43AM -0600, Mirimir wrote: > > I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is > > fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. > > Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be > > vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better? > > Agreed. As I read it, this is not Tor fork, just the browser, right?
Hey it's development - gotta start somewhere :) Those who want to start from a clean slate - go for it! The more options the better..