why not develop ???????????????????????????? tor is perfect we have reached the pennacle of everything on the planet so why would anything need development anywhere /..... all sectors are solid perfection ... no need for any human to even move a pinky finger
a main stance for tor has long been to function just at the level to keep development from being too needed so the people would not move beyond it On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Mirimir <miri...@riseup.net> wrote: > On 08/20/2016 12:04 AM, Александр wrote: > > Great news. > > > > For those who have suggested it there's already plans and a roadmap for > the > >> fork of Tor. Two concurrent networks which are compatible with a > singular > >> browser would greatly diversify the ecosystem and give users more > choice. > >> At this point this is the only way forward imo. More info: > >> https://rotorbrowser.com > > I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is > fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. > Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be > vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better? > > -- Cari Machet NYC 646-436-7795 carimac...@gmail.com AIM carismachet Syria +963-099 277 3243 Amman +962 077 636 9407 Berlin +49 152 11779219 Reykjavik +354 894 8650 Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet> 7035 690E 5E47 41D4 B0E5 B3D1 AF90 49D6 BE09 2187 Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without permission is strictly prohibited.