> > miri...@riseup.net: > I don't see the point. As Juan so likes to remind us, Tor design is > fundamentally flawed, in that it's vulnerable to global adversaries. > Which, in practice, means US military. So how would a fork not be > vulnerable as well? Instead, why not develop something better? >
Absolutely right, Mirmir. BUT despite it i am happy forks are emerging only because of the fact, that it is weakening the original Tor and it's feminazi-slanderers leaders. If there are forks, also they are not the "only ones" holding/producing Tor binaries. Yes, of course, a totally alternative system will be the best (and for killing the original flawed tor and for a true anonymity tool), BUT as far as i can see, there are no real alternatives yet. That's why i'm happy, at least, by the fact of the forks. It's a form of rebel against Tor and its pseudo leaders.