On 08/23/2016 04:22 PM, Steve Kinney wrote:
> just a few individuals with CVs more relevant to a specific form of political > warfare than software development Corporate hacks suffice. After all, that IS what corporate hackdom requires.. Political warfare. Rr > > > On 08/23/2016 06:05 PM, Sean Lynch wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:59 PM Steve Kinney <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> I certainly wouldn't mind seeing experimentation with padding & >> mixing, but between more innovative features and a more >> conservative codebase, I'm not sure which one I'd trust, especially >> when the former are written by people so dumb as to think that >> there's some vast conspiracy against Appelbaum. > > Not "some vast conspiracy," just a few individuals with CVs more > relevant to a specific form of political warfare than software > development, behaving exactly as if they had been hand picked by a > hostile actor and given a line of attack to pursue. The beauty part: > "Prove it." ;) > > As universal surveillance and profiling technologies mature, so will > tools for analyzing organizations to identify exploitable weaknesses > of key figures, and identifying candidates to recruit or influence to > do that exploitation. The phrase "CIA Computer Dating & Job Placement > Service" sums up a toolkit that makes formerly difficult, expensive > categories of clandestine operations both more affordable and > reliable, which makes smaller, less important targets accessible. > > The technology exists, an eager market wants it, blank checks are > available to make it happen. Individuals and organizations working > against State and Corporate agendas should adjust their behavior > accordingly. > > :o/ > > > > > > > >
