On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 02:22:30 +0000 > Sean Lynch <se...@literati.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:36 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > For Sean, who apparently doesn't know that google and the > > > rest of 'technology' psychos are US military contractors > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%29 > > > > > > > > > > > PRISM required (and received) no cooperation from Facebook or Google, > > > > "Internet giants like Google and Yahoo received millions of > dollars from the NSA to cover their surveillance under the > PRISM program" > > "The money was meant to cover expenses the companies incurred > under court orders mandating the companies assist the NSA in > its BULK COLLECTION of data" > > fuck you Sean. > > "The PRISM program involves the bulk collection of data from > companies under the FISA Amendments Acts," > > > And of course, if these sick fucks especially google, say they > 'collected' 1% or whatever bullshit figure, multiply that by a > factor big enough to get 100% > > > But hey, only 'conspiracy theorists' would doubt whatever > google and the americunt government say. > > You are aware Daily Mail is a *tabloid*, right? The Wikipedia article you link talks about the NSA giving money to "PRISM partners", but Google was not a "PRISM partner" in any sense. Nor was Facebook (where I worked at the time). Pretty sure Apple wasn't. Not as sure about MS but I doubt they were either, even if they may have been a little bit closer. The most likely "PRISM partners" were telcos.
Sorry if I don't play into your desperate motivated reasoning here. If that angers you, so be it.
