On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:05:57 +0000 Sean Lynch <se...@literati.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:11 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 02:22:30 +0000 > > Sean Lynch <se...@literati.org> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:36 PM juan <juan....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For Sean, who apparently doesn't know that google and > > > > the rest of 'technology' psychos are US military contractors > > > > > > > > > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM_%28surveillance_program%29 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PRISM required (and received) no cooperation from Facebook or > > > Google, > > > > > > > > "Internet giants like Google and Yahoo received millions of > > dollars from the NSA to cover their surveillance under the > > PRISM program" > > > > "The money was meant to cover expenses the companies > > incurred under court orders mandating the companies assist the NSA > > in its BULK COLLECTION of data" > > > > fuck you Sean. > > > > "The PRISM program involves the bulk collection of data from > > companies under the FISA Amendments Acts," > > > > > > And of course, if these sick fucks especially google, say > > they 'collected' 1% or whatever bullshit figure, multiply that by a > > factor big enough to get 100% > > > > > > But hey, only 'conspiracy theorists' would doubt whatever > > google and the americunt government say. > > > > > You are aware Daily Mail is a *tabloid*, The quotes come from wired, fucktard. > right? The Wikipedia article > you link talks about the NSA giving money to "PRISM partners", but > Google was not a "PRISM partner" in any sense. Nor was Facebook > (where I worked at the time). WHOA. Keep digging yourself deeper. > Pretty sure Apple wasn't. Not as sure > about MS but I doubt they were either, even if they may have been a > little bit closer. The most likely "PRISM partners" were telcos. > > Sorry if I don't play into your desperate motivated reasoning here. > If that angers you, so be it.
