On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin C. Martin wrote: > > +1 for reply-to header, since it seems to be the standard these days. > > Having Cython-dev be different than the vast majority of lists would be > > confusing. > > I definitely would not say "reply-to" header mangling was "standard". I know > a > couple of people who actually use "reply-to" headers themselves. That would > plain conflict with a "standard reply-to header" in mailing lists.
This is not true. Mailman can be configured to not strip people's reply-to address before adding its own: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
