Like top-posting, I guess? Oh, I'm so old fashioned ...
Stefan Martin C. Martin top-posted: > It's based on the more "mass market" lists, like Yahoo! Groups and > Google Groups, and generally mailing lists for non technical matters. > > I think "no reply-to" was standard back when the internet was mostly > geeks, but with the advent of the web, "reply-to" became the standard, > at least outside the Unix world. > > Best, > Martin > > Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Martin C. Martin wrote: >>> +1 for reply-to header, since it seems to be the standard these days. >>> Having Cython-dev be different than the vast majority of lists would >>> be confusing. >> >> I definitely would not say "reply-to" header mangling was "standard". >> I know a >> couple of people who actually use "reply-to" headers themselves. That >> would >> plain conflict with a "standard reply-to header" in mailing lists. >> >> Is that experience backed mainly by Google groups or by real mailing >> lists? >> >> For example, Debian lists do not seem to uses it, and Debian has quite a >> number of lists. >> >> Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
