Martin C. Martin wrote: > +1 for reply-to header, since it seems to be the standard these days. > Having Cython-dev be different than the vast majority of lists would be > confusing.
I definitely would not say "reply-to" header mangling was "standard". I know a couple of people who actually use "reply-to" headers themselves. That would plain conflict with a "standard reply-to header" in mailing lists. Is that experience backed mainly by Google groups or by real mailing lists? For example, Debian lists do not seem to uses it, and Debian has quite a number of lists. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
