Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 18:43:00 -0800, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> Ignore the two-patch bundle I just sent, this folds both (and two >> other fixes) into a single patch. >> >> Fri Nov 7 13:42:22 EST 2008 Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> * Remove dangling .lhs references. >> Sorry about this, folks; it seems my conflict merging had a few bugs.
This kind of cock-up seems to be common (at least for me); often minutes after sending a bundle to the list, I'll realize I made a dumb mistake, and amend and re-send it. To avoid inadvertently applying a cock-up bundle to unstable (which would annoy the amend-recording author), how do you (Eric) feel about a general rule of not applying (to unstable) any bundle sent in the last twenty-four hours? That is, after I send a bundle, I have a guaranteed minimum twenty-four hour window in which to discover (and amend, resend) cock-ups, and other denizens have that same window in which to review the patch and scream something like "Noooooo! Don't apply this; doing so will cause the heavens to fall and the ground to be rent asunder." _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
