On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:30:17 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > This kind of cock-up seems to be common (at least for me); often minutes > after sending a bundle to the list, I'll realize I made a dumb mistake, > and amend and re-send it. > > To avoid inadvertently applying a cock-up bundle to unstable (which > would annoy the amend-recording author), how do you (Eric) feel about a > general rule of not applying (to unstable) any bundle sent in the last > twenty-four hours?
I am open to trying this out if this is something enough developers support (developers who want a faster turaround can just say so). From a strictly technical standpoint, I may be too confused to do this until we have some sort of patch tracker. Let's revisit this question later when I have settled into unstable maintainence a bit :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
