Trent W. Buck wrote:
http://darcs.daniel.carrera.bz/
IMO it actually looks nice.
I respectfully disagree. It uses tables (instead of CSS)
Look, it's just a theme, there are a hundred themes. There is a CSS-only
version of this theme. Keep in mind I only spent 24 minutes on this.
It's crazy that you nit-pick like this. You said that it would be
extremely hard to setup. I proved you I could do it in 24min. Switching
to a CSS-only version of the same theme is trivial.
The front page also has some accessibility warnings (note that many are
usually false positives):
$ curl -s http://darcs.daniel.carrera.bz/ | tidy --accessibility-check 3
>/dev/null
line 121 column 3 - Warning: missing <td>
I did this in 24min. How do you think it looks to me when I see you
doing a test like this on a website that was purposely made quickly?
Incidentally, this website has pretty good accessibility and usability
compared to most websites. The text has a good contrast with the
background, it's not overly busy, etc.
For further advice on how to make your pages accessible
see http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL and
http://www.aprompt.ca/Tidy/accessibilitychecks.html.
. You may also want to try
"http://www.cast.org/bobby/"; which is a free Web-based
service for checking URLs for accessibility.
To learn more about HTML Tidy see http://tidy.sourceforge.net
Please fill bug reports and queries using the "tracker" on the Tidy web site.
Additionally, questions can be sent to [email protected]
HTML and CSS specifications are available from http://www.w3.org/
Lobby your company to join W3C, see http://www.w3.org/Consortium
Are you trying to insult me?
You think I have never heard of WAI or Tidy?
Daniel.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
