As Eric has already made a policy decision, this response is merely to clarify one or two points.
Daniel Carrera <[email protected]> writes: > Trent W. Buck wrote: >>> I think Drupal is very easy to use. >> >> We'll just have to disagree on this point. > > Damn it, have you even seen it? I looked at the demo you produced. > Yesterday you thought that Drupal was derived from Moodle, which is > absurd, but today you are still adamant. Because I hate CMSs. For me, they are as much a step backwards from something like gitit or ikiwiki as web forums are a step backwards from netnews. > I've seen people who are seriously clueless pick up Drupal instantly. I'm not interested in making things easy for the clueless. I'm interested in making things easy for me. > Eric already expressed his reasons for not wanting Drupal, he did so > in a polite and respectful way and I accepted them in a friendly and > positive way. Why can't you do likewise? Because I'm a rude and selfish bastard, and I don't care if I offend people or hurt their feelings. And I hate the very idea of CMSs, so I get emotional when someone advocates adopting one for the project for which I am de facto documentation manager. I didn't set out to be impolite, merely to strenuously oppose a particular idea. >> I would rather you spent those 30 minutes improving the existing >> documentation, rather than its "look and feel". > > Navigation and organization is important. Granted. > If you can't find the resources you need, they might as well not be > there. This is what started the whole discussion. AIUI, this discussion started because there was no single cohesive document on patch theory. I don't believe that improving navigation between the existing disparate, incomplete and largely obsolete documentation would significantly improve matters. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
