Gour wrote:
"Simon" == Simon Michael <[email protected]> writes:
Simon> Are there specific unsupported features that we use, or need ?
According to pandoc's README: "Note that the rst reader only parses a
subset of reStructuredText syntax. For example, it doesn’t handle
tables, option lists, or footnotes. But for simple documents it should
be adequate."
(see http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/README.html)
If we want to make a feature request for reST syntax that pandoc should
support that should be important to darcs, Option Lists should be a high
priority.
Option lists look mostly like darcs' current help output for --options
and allow for nicer formatting of them in richer environments like HTML.
Darcs has a lot of options and option lists are obviously handy for that.
Tables and Footnotes are certainly nice-to-haves, but probably not as
immediately useful to darcs as Option Lists.
--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
