Wouldn't it be better to have one pr of small organized commits? It would
allow us to see the big picture better...
Le 27 juin 2013 14:18, "Lebedev Roman" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> **
>
> Hello list!
>
> I would like to start a discussion about porting darktable to gtk3.
>
>
>
> Current port status(using my branch gtk3-porting[1]): most of the work is
> already done. DT now compiles with gtk3, but is not actual working GTK+3
> gui :)
>
> But my branch is just a lot of huge unstructured commits.
>
>
>
> I would like to split my branch into BIG amount of simple, self-sufficient
> commits, and send each one as PR.
>
> For now, there won't be any commits that would actually port DT from gtk2
> to gtk3, but they will just prepare codebase for it.
>
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm already prepared first branch-PR candidate: [2]
>
> If it would be decided that this idea is ok, i'll send a PR.
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/LebedevRI/darktable/tree/gtk3-porting
>
> [2] https://github.com/LebedevRI/darktable/tree/gtk3-00-use-_key_-infix
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> darktable-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
