Well, my pointe about Wayland was not to get it working to begin with, just
to have it in mind to avoid the direct X11 dependencies.
And about Gnome, i realize that it is just one desktop amongst others....
maybe some plugin based desktop integration.
//Mattias
2013/6/28 Lebedev Roman <[email protected]>
> **
>
> About Wayland:
>
> Well, yes, that has a point.
>
> But that will not happen until certain conditions are met:
>
> 1. Full gtk3 port is in place
>
> 2. I have a working Wayland on my computer to test stuff before submitting
> patches :)
>
>
>
> About gnome:
>
> I do not think so, and I have a very bad attitude to any such integration
> with the gnome.
>
> I do NOT want to start another GUI gtk-qt-gnome-kde-whateverelse holywar
> so i will not write any reasons or alternatives for that.
>
>
>
> 27 of June 2013, 22:56:55 from Mattias Eriksson <[email protected]>
>
> When you port to Gtk3, just make sure to not use any of the X11 gtk stuff
> directly to make sure it will work with Wayland. Also, it would be nice to
> use the Gnome-shell application menu to provide access to things like
> preferences, import, change views and things like that. Note that I do not
> suggest to remove this from the normal gui but provide additional ways to
> access it if the gnome-shell menu is available (
> https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/PortToGMenu ).
>
>
> //Snaggen
>
>
>
> 2013/6/27 jeremy rosen <[email protected]>
>
> Wouldn't it be better to have one pr of small organized commits? It would
> allow us to see the big picture better...
>
> Le 27 juin 2013 14:18, "Lebedev Roman" <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hello list!
>
> I would like to start a discussion about porting darktable to gtk3.
>
>
>
> Current port status(using my branch gtk3-porting[1]): most of the work is
> already done. DT now compiles with gtk3, but is not actual working GTK+3
> gui :)
>
> But my branch is just a lot of huge unstructured commits.
>
>
>
> I would like to split my branch into BIG amount of simple, self-sufficient
> commits, and send each one as PR.
>
> For now, there won't be any commits that would actually port DT from gtk2
> to gtk3, but they will just prepare codebase for it.
>
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
>
>
> I'm already prepared first branch-PR candidate: [2]
>
> If it would be decided that this idea is ok, i'll send a PR.
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/LebedevRI/darktable/tree/gtk3-porting
>
> [2] https://github.com/LebedevRI/darktable/tree/gtk3-00-use-_key_-infix
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> darktable-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
>
> Build for Windows Store.
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> darktable-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
darktable-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
