All the *.icm files are 1.6MB in size except one which is 22KB in size -
this one was named quite differently in Windows, so i expect that is the
one that is almost working.

Is it possible to determine why darktable thinks it is not a valid profile?

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 at 12:18 Colin Adams <colinpaulad...@gmail.com> wrote:

> So I tried this (I have a Nikon D810).
>
> When selecting any of the generated icc profiles except the last one, I
> get a message:
> "unsupported input profile has been replaced by linear Rec709 RGB!"
> So I selected the last one, and set unbreak input profile to 0.0 as you
> instruct.
> The resulting image indeed looks to have slightly better quality, but it
> has a green cast.
> This is with darktable 2.0.5-1 rather than 2.0.4. I'm doubtful if that
> should be making the difference though.
>
> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 15:39 Jean-Luc CECCOLI <jean-luc.cecc...@wanadoo.fr>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Very interesting.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rgds,
>>
>>
>>
>> J.-Luc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > Message du 26/07/16 20:41
>> > De : "Vidar Hoel" <vidar.h...@sysrq.info>
>> > A : "Jean-Luc CECCOLI" <jean-luc.cecc...@wanadoo.fr>,
>> darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
>> > Copie à :
>> > Objet : Re: [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files
>>
>>
>> >
>> > On 26. juli 2016 20:16, Jean-Luc CECCOLI wrote:
>> > > Hello,
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > > Just one thing that puzzles me : Nikon ViewNX2 generates a profile for
>> > > each picture it processes, so each
>> > > profile is based upon the parameters of this picture.
>> >
>> > Almost. It generates a different profile for each camera setting (it
>> > seems like). So of mine 98 pictures, I got 10 different profiles.
>> >
>> > > That would mean that, for each picture, one would have to use the
>> > > corresponding imported profile, else one
>> > > might get even worse results than using the DT dedicated basecurve,
>> > > isn't it ?
>> >
>> > After applying all 10 different profiles to the same image, I
>> discovered
>> > it was only minor differences, and so small I can neglect them. I have
>> > never seen them make a worse result than the dedicated base curves. But
>> > this is a subjective observation!
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Vidar Hoel
>> >
>> > > That said, I think that that is the way profiles work...
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > J.-Luc
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Message du 26/07/16 18:45
>> > > > De : "Vidar Hoel" <vidar.h...@sysrq.info>
>> > > > A : darktable-user@lists.darktable.org
>> > > > Copie à :
>> > > > Objet : [darktable-user] A better starting-point for Nikon RAW-files
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > some time ago I noticed that the JPGs from my Nikon were better then
>> > > > what I could achieve from processing the RAW-file (NEF) in
>> Darktable.
>> > > > After some digging on the Internet, I figured out I could use an
>> > > > alternative to the default base-curves in Darktable - and that
>> > > made me
>> > > > get a better starting-point when processing my Nikon RAW-files (and
>> I
>> > > > was able to achieve a better image than the JPGs from my camera!)
>> > > >
>> > > > Today I finished a step-by-step video of what I did, so anyone can
>> > > see,
>> > > > learn and perhaps do it themselves.
>> > > >
>> > > > Some notes before viewing:
>> > > > - I am not really sure behind the technology behind this. I am not
>> > > sure
>> > > > if a Nikon RAW-file has a profile embedded, but it seems so.
>> > > > - I am not sure if there is an other way to achieve this is
>> Darktable?
>> > > > - As explained in the video, you will need Windows, or a friends
>> > > laptop
>> > > > with Windows, once, to make this work.
>> > > > - My native language is not English :-)
>> > > >
>> > > > https://youtu.be/O1nS3URVSYA
>> > > >
>> > > > Enjoy :-)
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > Vidar Hoel
>> > > >
>> > >
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>> > > > darktable user mailing list
>> > > > to unsubscribe send a mail to
>> > > darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>> > darktable user mailing list
>> > to unsubscribe send a mail to
>> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________________________
>> darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
>> darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
>>
>

____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to