On Sun, 19 Aug 2001, Chris Nandor wrote:
> In article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Bowen) wrote:
>
> > So, I get the impression that Jarkko is not terribly thrilled with
> > this sort of name change, which, along with the fact that I have been
> > rather buried in other things, is why I have not done this yet. I did
> > not follow the entire conversation on P5P, or wherever that was. What
> > was the final decision on this? Is this something we want to do?
>
> I don't recall seeing Jarkko unhappy with the change, just that he
> decided not to include Time::Piece (nee Time::Object) in the core.
> However, I did not follow the discussion closely. He is leaving for
> vacation soon, you might want to email him now and find out (unless he's
> already left ... :-).
Bah, now I can't find the article in the archived. Basically he said
that 3-level names (foo::bar::baz) were unnecessarily hard to find,
and did not do anything to improve the situation. I'm still looking
for the actual postings, and I can't figure out where I saw them.
Skud, do you recall where that discussionwas?
--
HTML Writers Guild training classes
http://www.hwg.org/services/classes/
