On 1/19/03 2:31 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, John Siracusa wrote: >>> He might be a better person than I to start a discussion about this on >>> dbi-dev. I'm on that list, so I'll chime in as needed. >> >> Okay, I'll pursue that. > > This might be premature. Tim B might not want to talk about vaporware > DateTime code (yes, there's stuff in CVS, but it's far from done).
Regardless of how the new DateTime stuff turns out, I've always wanted this functionality in DBI even if it's implemented using existing date modules. The idea is to make it flexible about what date module(s) it uses to do the work. -John
