Is there a special reason why you do not use DBD::Pg? It should be
faster because it has less overhead and it supports Unicode better than
DBD::ODBC, should you need it. DBD::ODBC has seen no update since about
three years, while the current DBD::Pg is just one year old.
Alexander
On 13.07.2007 00:11, Craig Metzer wrote:
I'm having trouble installing DBD::ODBC 1.13 on a system with postgresql. It
appears it's because it can't find the sql.h, sqlext.h, etc. headers. I
installed the developer and library packages that were supposed to contain
these headers. Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong or where to
find the headers?
TIA,
Craig
--
Alexander Foken
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foken.de/alexander/
