There is also a DBD::Oracle, also with less overhead than DBD::ODBC,
also with better Unicode support, also with the latest release being two
years younger than DBD::ODBCs latest release.
Are you really sure you need ODBC?
Alexander
On 13.07.2007 21:11, Craig Metzer wrote:
Yes Alexander,
I'm only using the local pgsql server for the script development. After I get my Perl script worked out, I'm going to move the db to our enterprise Oracle server. I'll need ODBC for that.
Craig
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:57:03 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected]> Subject: Re: Trouble Installing DBD::ODBC with postgresql> > Is there a special reason why you do not use DBD::Pg? It should be > faster because it has less overhead and it supports Unicode better than > DBD::ODBC, should you need it. DBD::ODBC has seen no update since about > three years, while the current DBD::Pg is just one year old.> > Alexander> > On 13.07.2007 00:11, Craig Metzer wrote:> > I'm having trouble installing DBD::ODBC 1.13 on a system with postgresql. It appears it's because it can't find the sql.h, sqlext.h, etc. headers. I installed the developer and library packages that were supposed to contain these headers. Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong or where to find the headers?> > > > TIA,> > Craig> > > > > > -- > Alexander Foken> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foken.de/alexander/>
_________________________________________________________________
Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary!
http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink
--
Alexander Foken
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foken.de/alexander/
