Why not use DBD::Oracle if you are moving to a Oracle server. -----Original Message----- From: Craig Metzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 1:12 PM To: Alexander Foken Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Trouble Installing DBD::ODBC with postgresql
Yes Alexander, I'm only using the local pgsql server for the script development. After I get my Perl script worked out, I'm going to move the db to our enterprise Oracle server. I'll need ODBC for that. Craig > Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:57:03 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [email protected]> Subject: Re: > Trouble Installing DBD::ODBC with postgresql> > Is there a special > reason why you do not use DBD::Pg? It should be > faster because it > has less overhead and it supports Unicode better than > DBD::ODBC, > should you need it. DBD::ODBC has seen no update since about > three > years, while the current DBD::Pg is just one year old.> > Alexander> > > On 13.07.2007 00:11, Craig Metzer wrote:> > I'm having trouble > installing DBD::ODBC 1.13 on a system with postgresql. It appears it's > because it can't find the sql.h, sqlext.h, etc. headers. I installed > the developer and library packages that were supposed to contain these > headers. Could someone please tell me what I'm doing wrong or where to > find the headers?> > > > TIA,> > Craig> > > > > > -- > Alexander > Foken> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.foken.de/alexander/> _________________________________________________________________ Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary! http://club.live.com/chicktionary.aspx?icid=chick_wlmailtextlink
