Alexander Foken wrote:
Is there a special reason why you do not use DBD::Pg? It should be
faster because it has less overhead and it supports Unicode better
than DBD::ODBC, should you need it. DBD::ODBC has seen no update since
about three years, while the current DBD::Pg is just one year old.
Alexander
Just so everyone on the list knows. I did a development release of
DBD::ODBC (1.14_1) a little over a week ago. You can find it on cpan. It
fixes all bugs I know about except one on rt.cpan I have not sufficient
info as yet to look at. If anyone knows of any other issues please
report them on rt.cpan and I will look in to them. Unless I hear from
anyone I'll release 1.14 properly late next week.
Martin
On 13.07.2007 00:11, Craig Metzer wrote:
I'm having trouble installing DBD::ODBC 1.13 on a system with
postgresql. It appears it's because it can't find the sql.h,
sqlext.h, etc. headers. I installed the developer and library
packages that were supposed to contain these headers. Could someone
please tell me what I'm doing wrong or where to find the headers?
TIA,
Craig
