> It is now much harder to advance either of these points. Why?
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Peter Rabbitson <rabbit+d...@rabbit.us> wrote: > This is not a response to the entirety of your email, but just one > particular bit. > > On 10/05/2016 05:24 AM, Karen Etheridge wrote: > >> >> 3) Since I had contracted Peter (via my employer) for particular patches >> last >> year, I didn't want to say or do anything that would distract him or >> disrupt >> that work, or become a conflict of interest with it; see also (2). >> > > This was a really inappropriate piece of information to drop in a public > forum for two reasons: > > 1) that work has not yet been completed > 2) I have not actually billed your employer for anything > > It is now much harder to advance either of these points. > > > > _______________________________________________ > List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class > IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class > SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ > Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/ > dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk >
_______________________________________________ List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/ Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
