On 10/05/2016 08:50 AM, Karen Etheridge wrote:
It is now much harder to advance either of these points.
Why?
Because now that you causally dropped an insinuation that a part of the
work I put into DBIC itself was performed for material gain, a casual
reader could interpret this entire thread as "Ribasushi tried to
strangle a CPAN project for his own profit". That would be despite the
fact that the core of your ( very complex and multi-layered )
work-related issue is in a module outside of ( and discouraged by ) the
DBIC project, and as such entirely outside of the scope of this discussion.
Given I have not placed a single line into *this* codebase with material
gain in mind, and because it is very important to me to distance myself
from the above implication, I essentially no longer can send you folks
an invoice for the other only tangentially related bits.
I am certain it won't really change the outcome of your employer still
getting what they wanted, given some of the pieces involved in fixing
your problem moved along far enough that I can't not wrap this up, in
light of my obligation to *other* users of the
::ResultSet::RecursiveUpdate stack.
So TLDR: nothing affecting you directly, but your unsolicited (and
unrelated to this thread) disclosure made the aftertaste of the entire
thing beyond unpleasant.
_______________________________________________
List: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbix-class
IRC: irc.perl.org#dbix-class
SVN: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/repos/bast/DBIx-Class/
Searchable Archive: http://www.grokbase.com/group/dbix-class@lists.scsys.co.uk
