""Sumbry]["" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > 1) Has anyone got the latest full CVS actually working correctly using the > > new table names?
I've been working on the database scripts this week, they're not done. In fact, I just filed a bug because the auto_replies and auto_notifications tables are not correctly upgraded -- they just get zapped and recreated! > Something else I'd like to see before a 2.0 release, is that dbmail has > support for Postgres transactions built in, but it's not actually using > them anywhere. I see the function calls in db.c, but they're not being > used. I don't know why we didn't add these calls into the code yet, but I think it's something that we can do during a point release because it's won't affect any user-visible interfaces. Aaron --
