> If we can find another way to comply with the RFC besides automatic > database sequence numbers, we will definitely go for it. Any ideas, > however crazy, are welcome... although the really crazy ones will probably > just be used to help come up with simple straightforward plans ;-)
Is it such that all messages gets a unique incrementing id system-wide or account-wide? Maybe we could make the imap daemon assign ids to all new messages in the database upon request. The only problem with that would be if there were two simultanious imap requests to the same account. That would let the account get incrementing ids starting from 1 on each account, not starting on 1 system-wide. This is the only feasibly way I can think of. -HK
