On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Paul Wilton <pwil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OpenLink - do you have a timescale for the DBpedia Live fixes.. ?
>
> Ideally, I would like to be able to move to DBpedia 2014 now + the new
> onotogy, and then apply changesets to this once Dbpedia LIve is back..
> you think this will be supported ? (ie changesets diffed from the 2014
> dbpedia dump)
>
No, this is not supported. Live has a continuous update stream while the
2014 dataset is static and based on wikipedia dumps from May 2014
>
> thanks
> Paul
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 8:21 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas <jimk...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 6:31 PM, Paul Wilton <pwil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Dimitris,
>>>
>>> Do you a timescale for when the Stalling issues will be fixed,
>>>
>>
>> OpenLink can answer this one
>>
>>
>>> and maybe a roadmap for the re-design you might be able to share ?
>>>
>> Is it possible to publish regular n-triples changesets to the DBpedia
>>> 2014 release ?
>>>
>>
>> At the moment the Live extraction is coupled with a VOS instance for
>> publishing changes immediately to the main Live endpoint so we cannot start
>> publishing changesets without fixing this issue
>> Part of our roadmap is the decoupling of changeset generation process
>> with the triple store update (for similar cases) and adding additional
>> services besides a SPARQL endpoint (i.e. S3 access)
>>
>> Best,
>> Dimitris
>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dimitris Kontokostas <jimk...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>> On Sep 12, 2014 5:31 PM, "Paul Wilton" <pwil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>> I have a couple of questions about DBpedia Live :
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Is it still Live. Last changesets seem to be on August 18th, and
>>>>> there was a big gap before that. Prior to this there were numerous
>>>>> changesets per day ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The database got corrupted twice in a short period and OpenLink is
>>>> working on a fix to track the source of the error. ATM the endpoint is up
>>>> but the changesets are stalled as you noticed
>>>>
>>>> 2. What is the project status - is it still actively maintained - (am
>>>>> considering using it on a fairly high profile project)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes it is, if fact we plan to re-design part of the existing
>>>> architecture to make more scalable
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 3. What version of DBpedia ontology does DBpedia Live conform too, and
>>>>> any plans for aligning with dbpedia 2014 ontology ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It keeps the latest version of the ontology according to the mappings
>>>> wiki. This is also stalled atm.
>>>> there is an open bug here that will be fixed as well:
>>>> https://github.com/dbpedia/extraction-framework/issues/165
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> many thanks for any help
>>>>> Paul Wilton
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.datalanguage.com
>>>>> http://twitter.com/datalanguage
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Want excitement?
>>>>> Manually upgrade your production database.
>>>>> When you want reliability, choose Perforce
>>>>> Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
>>>>> Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Kontokostas Dimitris
>>
>
>
--
Kontokostas Dimitris
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When you want reliability, choose Perforce
Perforce version control. Predictably reliable.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Dbpedia-discussion mailing list
Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
