On 9/18/14 7:17 AM, Paul Wilton wrote:
yep - but given Live is not Live anymore... you will need to baseline changesets from somewhere once it comes back.. it seems DBpedia2014 dumps would be a good place to start ?or at least provide them ?As a consumer adopting DBpedia 2014, any applications built upon it (like we are doing at the BBC) will become progressively stale. Wouldn't it make sense to provide Live changesets to this going forwards ? It would certainly encourage uptake, and make for a much more useful offering, and allow consumers to build much more useful applications ?
I am investigating this matter internally. The DBpedia-Live effort has been coordination challenged for a while now.
I or someone from OpenLink will get back to everyone re., this matter, from our perspective.
-- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog 1: http://kidehen.blogspot.com Personal Weblog 2: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen Personal WebID: http://kingsley.idehen.net/dataspace/person/kidehen#this
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Dbpedia-discussion mailing list Dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-discussion
