If you produce a work full of errors & take offense when people don't regard it as perfect, you probably ought to be in another business. If you attack people who refuse to accept it for perfect, or who point out that it's testimony is untrustworthy -- tought titty.
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Dave Sorochty
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Michael Getz
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Darren E. Mason
- RE: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Doug Otto
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Darren E. Mason
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Darren E. Mason
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Scott Allan
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Concensus Michael Getz
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Scott Allan
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Kenny Schachat
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Jim Powell
- Re: 7/10/70 vs. 6/24/70 early; 7/11/70 + 7/12/70 Scott Allan