death penalty news

June 13, 2004


VIETNAM:

HANOI: Death penalty for embezzlement

A Vietnamese postal official has been sentenced to death for embezzling 
US$60,000 (RM228,000) from state coffers, state media said today. A 
provincial court found Tran Phuoc Toan, who worked at Vinh Loi district 
post office in the province of Bac Lieu, guilty of embezzlement yesterday, 
the Thanh Nien (Young People) daily reported.

The court found that Toan pocketed the money in 2001 and 2002 when he was 
in charge of selling 114,100 pre-paid mobile phone cards worth US$2.74 
million for the post office. He spent most of the money he embezzled on 
buying lottery tickets and betting on cock-fighting, the paper said.

The court also jailed the director of the post office, Tran Van Quyen, for 
four years for "dereliction of duty". At least 49 people have been 
sentenced to death this year in the communist nation and 33 have been 
executed by firing squad, according to figures from state media and court 
officials.

In a bid to restore its moral and ideological legitimacy, the communist 
regime has vowed to stamp out rampant corruption and other financial 
crimes. In April an appeal court upheld the death penalty issued against a 
director of a company under the agriculture ministry's control who was 
found guilty of misappropriating US$4.7 million and causing losses of 
US$2.2 million to state coffers.

(source: AFP)


================================

JAMAICA:

Echoes of Cargill on the death penalty

THE EDITOR, Sir:

WITH REFERENCE to Mr. Clive Mullings' call on the Government to enforce the 
death penalty or abolish the law, I wish to remind fellow Jamaicans of the 
words of the late Morris Cargill, published on February 11, 1999. These 
words are as true today as they were then:

"The Government is both weak and vacillating. It is weak because it has 
neither the courage to abolish hanging, yet has neither the courage nor the 
will to carry it out. This folly is aided and abetted by a bunch of 
bleeding hearts and their legal lackeys. A lawyer is obviously entitled to 
fight as hard as he can for the acquittal of his client. But I have no 
admiration for a lawyer who knowing that his client has been justly 
convicted of murder, nevertheless, uses every ridiculous appeal to 
frustrate the legal sentence of death. I am not surprised that murder is 
the only growth industry we have in Jamaica at present. It is time that all 
the nonsense stopped and that our law should not be frustrated."

How did we get to this sorry state? When Parliament debated the death 
penalty in 1979, on the basis of a conscience vote, the House of 
Representatives voted to retain the penalty and the Senate voted for a 
limited suspension.

It is time to have another conscience vote in Parliament. This time it 
should be on the resumption of hanging. When we see how the individuals in 
Gordon House vote then we will see those who side with the majority of 
Jamaicans on this issue and those who do not. This would be instructive.

I am, etc.,

WINNIE ANDERSON-BROWN

(Letter to the Editor, Jamaica Gleaner)

Reply via email to