Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > I do think there is still something for the TC to do here. As Andi > writes, the TC failed to clarify that we expect people to continue to > support multiple init systems. Evidently this was a mistake.
On what grounds do you think it was a mistake? As soon as someone talked to the maintainer in question and asked them to re-add support, support was almost immediately re-added. Sounds to me like our normal processes worked properly as soon as they were attempted, which is exactly the rationale that Keith presented originally for not over-dictating to the project how to go about its work. We have a long tradition of not making formal rulings on things that resolved themselves before we could get around to putting together a ballot, for much the same reasons that courts usually do the same. I think that tradition serves us well and that we should stick with it. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
