Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

> Russ Allbery writes ("Bug#746715: the foreseeable outcome of the TC vote on 
> init systems"):
>> On what grounds do you think it was a mistake?  As soon as someone talked
>> to the maintainer in question and asked them to re-add support, support
>> was almost immediately re-added.
>
> If the TC had said something earlier, to set the right expectations,
> the problem would probably have never been introduced in the first
> place.  

That's not clear to me at all.  Given the broad perception based on
http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1316 that upstart's future
prospects are now quite limited, I would have been surprised if someone
didn't eventually drop upstart-specific support in a package.  To assume
this portends broad abandonment of alternative init systems seems like a
*huge* stretch...

Bdale

Attachment: pgpVF2PnM5gGy.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to