On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Maybe the question we should ask is less «who/how many people use > htags?» and more «what value does htags provide?». I'm no big fan of > arbitrarily breaking people's workflows, which we might be the result > if we remove htags.
It sure looks like upstream has removed the CGI generation option from ctags itself, and no longer supports the --system-cgi option. Htags appear to now just be generated statically, with the possibility of a generated CGI as well [which seems to just set appropriate paths.] It's quite possible that I've totally missed something (the upstream manual is a bit impenetrable), but maybe this will obviate the need to answer this question? [Also, I'd like to note that currently Punit has not participated in the CTTE bug, and the last comment on #574947 was in 2014, so I'm not convinced that we have an alternative maintainer even if we were to decide to change ownership of this package.] -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com If everything seems to be going well, you have obviously overlooked something. -- Steven Wright