On 02/09/11 at 19:24 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 11:31:24 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > On 01.09.11 Francesco Poli (invernom...@paranoici.org) wrote: > > > On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 10:35:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > dep: libhttpclient-ruby1.8 (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > > > Transitional package for ruby-httpclient > > > > also a virtual package provided by ruby-httpclient > > > > > > Should I keep the version constraint in the dependency, as in: > > > > > > Depends: [...] ruby-httpclient (>= 2.1.5.2-1) > > > > > > in order to give useful hints to people who could wish to backport > > > future versions of apt-listbugs to squeeze (or earlier Debian versions)? > > > > > > Or should I just depend on an unversioned ruby-httpclient? > > > > > I'm sorry, I can't really help here. I suggest to contact the authors > > of the packages. > > Lucas, could you please advice? > You may find more context at http://bugs.debian.org/639972
Hi, Do you know why those versioned deps were introduced? In any case, using versioned deps is probably the safe solution here. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
