On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:17:04 +0200 Hilmar Preusse wrote: > On 04.09.11 Lucas Nussbaum (lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net) wrote: [...] > > If you want to facilitate backports, maybe use something like: > > ruby-cmdparse2 (>= X) | libcmdparse2-ruby (>= X) > > > I don't think that backporting apt-listbugs to Debian stable is > necessary as the # of RC bugs in stable doesn't vary. ;-)
Actually the number of RC bugs in Debian stable _does_ vary with time: see the blue line in http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ However, I agree that apt-listbugs does not seem to be too useful for Debian stable users. It is designed with Debian unstable (or testing) users in mind and it is indeed especially recommended for them. Nonetheless, believe it or not, I am aware of (at least) some users that run apt-listbugs on Debian stable boxes. One of them could try to backport a recent apt-listbugs to Debian stable, for his/her own needs (or even to upload it as official backport...). -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgp9zUM52hk8L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
