On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:22:54PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> > > the primary runtime.
> > ltdl needs them at runtime.
> Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2
> and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?

Possibly you can't. *shrug*

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''


Reply via email to