On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 09:22:54PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 07:29:23PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > > > the primary runtime. > > ltdl needs them at runtime. > Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2 > and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?
Possibly you can't. *shrug* Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
