On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote:

> > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in
> > > the primary runtime.
> > 
> > ltdl needs them at runtime.
> 
> Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2
> and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?

I was always under the impression that ltdl only really needed the .la
files on defective OS's, not on linux.. 

Just look in a .la, there is nothing in there that can't be properly done
by ld.so. 

Jason


Reply via email to