On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Ben Collins wrote: > > > Not only that, it's only useful for linking, so has no reason being in > > > the primary runtime. > > > > ltdl needs them at runtime. > > Then ltdl is broken. How does one install libfoo.so.1 and libfoo.so.2 > and only have libfoo.la, and ltdl expect to work?
I was always under the impression that ltdl only really needed the .la files on defective OS's, not on linux.. Just look in a .la, there is nothing in there that can't be properly done by ld.so. Jason
