#include <hallo.h> * D. Starner [Fri, Oct 22 2004, 11:31:10AM]: > > And before you think about writing another message, > > think about the reason for having the debian-private ML.
And why do you move parts of my message around?! To place your part of the "answer" in the beginning, to look more important? But, hey, why t.f. do you not just go and fix some bugs instead of writing another useless message? Maybe beginning with your own packages, or looking at some RC bugs? > The reason why debian-private exists is so people can > talk about sensitive issues without posting them on > the web, especially things involving personal or private > things between people. It's not so we can hide technical > discussions about non-security issues away from everyone. Starting another mega-thread on controversial issue causes ill-feeling, wastage of spare time and loss of productivity. And there are _always_ flamewars when something says "GR draft" or even postes a controversial paper looking like a "good" GR candidate. Or do you really believe that mega-threads help much? Do you really think that Canonical/Ubuntu is more successfull because they discuss more and let everyone publish its 0.02$ that everybody needs to read? Do you really think that the explosion of redudant messages in mega-threads is productive? > That that's wrong. That GRs have been proposed way too much recently. Exactly. That is why I am not going to release a half-done paper. It is better to be discussed in a small circle. The GR drafts posted in the last months caused something I wish to avoid - fscking huge flamewars. > > We do not hide problems, we hide > > possible solutions. > > And that's _so_ much better. If we get more important things done first - yes. And from now, I will refuse to answer to anything posted to this subthread. Regards, Eduard. -- <stockholm> Overfiend: why dont you flame him? you are good at that. <Overfiend> I have too much else to do.
