Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 07:53:27AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > > Err... experimental ABI changes are for experimental. Confirmed ABI > > and API changes are for unstable (or whatever you want to call the > > development branch). We must not hide those changes from the future > > stable distribution since it was done and confirmed upstream. > > Are you saying you would go with a (for instance) gcc ABI change right > now (i.e. while trying to release) in unstable if there was one ?
As somebody said, the world is not binary. This also has to be decided on a per-use case. Hence, I cannot provide a yes/no answer to this general question. Regards, Joey -- MIME - broken solution for a broken design. -- Ralf Baechle Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.