On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 08:13:50AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:45:45 +1000, Anthony Towns > <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> wrote: > >Once you get over giggling at the phrasing (or maybe that's just me), > >there're a few answers. The ones that come to my mind are: > > > > (a) Just build against testing/stable instead of unstable; when etch > >happens, fix up any remaining problems, and release a snapshot that more > >or less matches etch. Rinse, repeat. > > > > (b) Just build against unstable, until you get bored. Then stop, clean > >up some stuff and do some basic testing, then release a snapshot. > > > > (c) Something else > > > >Note that it's the porters who'll have to make that call. If you do it > >well, your port could even end up better supported than i386. > > Is there support from the Debian infrastructure for (a)? If yes, > please amend the Vancouver Document which currently says that (b) is > the only option. If no, please stop joking.
The correct question would be "Will there be support from the Debian infrastructure [...] ?" There is nothing yet for either of them (which is one of the reasons to start the discussion about it before the sarge release...) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]