Hi Thorsten, On Di, 21 Mai 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >Currently everyone is upgrading libkpathsea6 to in incompatible > >version, because texlive-lang is in NEW and the partial upgrade > >breaks the whole TeX system. > > I *really* hope you’re joking here.
No. > That to prevent is what package relationships are for! And? I did lots of test, but forgot that texlive-lang will be in the NEW queue, thus full upgrades will not work. Yes, errors happen, and that is the reason I fixed it in a new upload. > You might want to develop a better relationship (not package) > with the packages you depend on; I’ve fixed lots of bugs in It is my own package, no need to complain. > resolved *correctly*, with*out* introducing further security > issues and RC bugs. CAN YOU ALL STOP BITCHING AROUND ABOUT A NON-EXISTING ISSUE?!?!?!?!?! How many times do I have to explain that * the code is NOT USED but for the configure step and NO PROGRAM is linked against it * a upcoming upload will remove the code again (thanks to Ondřej) I am always told that I am disruptive and aggressive, but all those people incapable of reading and understanding emails should get the same treatment please. I repeat, everyone listen THERE IS NO SECURITY ISSUE ! ! ! ! ! And now can all of you please stop this useless thread ... Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------ PREINING, Norbert http://www.preining.info JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130522002022.gb31...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at
